PLUS for regulars you can have their details as a bill payment, meaning you don't have to type them in every time, just click on their name and how much to send.
It's more hassle for you to send, it's more hassle for the recipient to have to pay in, and it takes much longer to execute (during which time the recipient hasn't got their money and you have to keep remembering how much less money your bank balance really has than it shows). The situation you've described is an almost perfect example of why cheques are much less useful than bank transfers. Oh, and if you're sending these cheques out regularly some are bound to get lost in the post sooner or later. And the funds are usually available to the recipient in a few hours rather than several days for the post to arrive, zero to "a few" days for them to get to a bank to pay it in, and then several more days for the cheque to clear. Plus the bank transfer costs you 0p in postage instead of 28p/46p postage.
#USBANK CHEQUEBOOK CODE#
It would take less time to click "make payment", type a 14-digit sort code and account number, then "10.00" and click OK - than it would to write out a cheque, sign it and write out the recipient's address on the envelope.
This statement really doesn't make sense to me. I was looking to start an online referral program which I'd pay people with cheques, as its not worth my time transferring 10 pounds or so.
0 kommentar(er)
